Increased Prevalence of Advanced Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Fibrosis in Type 2 Diabetics Despite Low-Risk Fibrosis-4 Index Scores

Jordan S. Woodard, Gary A. Abrams

Abstract


Background: The American Gastroenterology Association (AGA) guidelines for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) recommend screening for fibrosis in high-risk subjects with either type 2 diabetes, two or more metabolic risk factors, or steatosis on imaging. The 2021 AGA guidelines recommend calculating a fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) score, and patients with scores above low-risk require further workup with FibroScan to assess liver stiffness measurement (LSM), a surrogate for liver fibrosis. However, FIB-4 scores have been suggested to be less accurate in patients with type 2 diabetes. The aim of our study was to identify the prevalence of significant to advanced fibrosis in subjects with a low-risk FIB-4 value with FibroScans LSM in type 2 diabetes.

Methods: A total of 1,153 subjects were referred to our liver center between August 2019 and September 2022; 1,114 subjects met MASLD criteria with data to calculate FIB-4 values. Subjects were categorized into age adjusted low-risk FIB-4 groups. Diagnosis of diabetes was determined by medical history.

Results: Low-risk age-adjusted FIB-4 scores were observed in 68.3% of older subjects and 73.4% of younger subjects (P = not significant (NS)). In the older group and younger cohorts, a LSM 10 kPa was noted in 21% suggesting advanced liver fibrosis. Seventy-one point six percent of older diabetic subjects had low FIB-4 values, similar to 67.2% of young diabetic subjects with low FIB4 values. Overall, 72% of subjects would not have been referred for FibroScan per AGA criteria. Despite low-risk FIB-4 scores, 257 subjects had LSM greater than or equal to 8 kPa and 148 underwent a liver biopsy. Forty-eight percent of patients with biopsies had significant fibrosis (F2-4), predominately affecting subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Conclusions: Diabetic subjects, despite having a low-risk FIB-4 tests, were four-fold more likely to demonstrate significant to advanced fibrosis, highlighting the limitations of FIB-4 in these individuals.




J Endocrinol Metab. 2024;14(1):40-47
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jem935

Keywords


MASLD; Hepatic fibrosis; FibroScan; FIB-4; Diabetes; Cirrhosis; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Full Text: HTML PDF
 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, bimonthly, ISSN 1923-2861 (print), 1923-287X (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jofem.org   editorial contact: editor@jofem.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.