The Impact of Vitamin D Status on Preoperative Ultrasound Findings and Parathyroidectomy Outcomes in Patients With Primary Hyperparathyroidism

Ashutosh Surya, Peter N. Taylor, Hussam Abusahmin, Onyebuchi Okosieme, Gautam Das

Abstract


Background: An impaired vitamin D status may present with an aggressive phenotype of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). We evaluated the impact of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D3) levels on pre-operative ultrasound findings and outcomes following parathyroidectomy.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 81 patients who had parathyroidectomy for PHPT from January 2008 to October 2016. Patients were grouped according to their 25(OH)D3 levels (deficient (< 30 nmol/L), insufficient (>= 30 and < 50 nmol/L), sufficient (>= 50 nmol/L)). All patients had preoperative ultrasound scans (USS) and their pre-and post-operative biochemistry results and pathology reports were obtained from the hospital portal system.

Results: Preoperatively, there was no statistically significant difference in parathyroid hormone (PTH) (P = 0.19) and adjusted calcium (P = 0.91) levels in different vitamin D subgroups. Parathyroidectomy led to significant improvement of PTH, adjusted calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase and creatinine levels (P < 0.00001). USS did not show any significant difference in localizing single gland disease (SGD) in vitamin D subgroups (sensitivity 57.1%, 62.5% and 55.8% in deficient, insufficient and sufficient groups respectively) and the chances of finding a negative scan was similar in all groups (about 44.5%). USS could not detect any multiple gland disease (MGD). Inferiorly located glands were more involved especially when 25(OH)D3 levels were in the deficient or insufficient range. Postoperatively, patients had higher adenoma weight in vitamin D deficient and insufficient groups (1.42 1.35 g and 1.11 1.39 g) compared to sufficient group (0.58 0.48 g) for SGD and trend was identical for the combined weight of glands in MGD (1.81 2.79 g; 0.93 0.58 g and 0.59 0.33 g respectively). Regression analysis showed an inverse association of 25(OH)D3 level with adenoma weight for SGD (r = -0.006; P = 0.008) but not when multiple glands were resected (r = -0.0007; P = 0.54).

Conclusions: Vitamin D does not influence biochemical severity of disease in PHPT. USS is a reliable tool for localization in SGD but ineffective for MGD and the sensitivity and specificity of scan results are not affected by vitamin D levels. Hypovitaminosis D leads to higher adenoma weight and an inverse relationship exists between the two for SGD.




J Endocrinol Metab. 2017;7(6):172-177
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jem477w


Keywords


Vitamin D; Ultrasound; Primary hyperparathyroidism; Parathyroidectomy; Single gland disease; Multiple gland disease

Full Text: HTML PDF
 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, bimonthly, ISSN 1923-2861 (print), 1923-287X (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jofem.org   editorial contact: editor@jofem.org    elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.