J Endocrinol Metab
Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, ISSN 1923-2861 print, 1923-287X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Endocrinol Metab and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jofem.org

Case Report

Volume 6, Number 1, February 2016, pages 30-32

Inaccuracies of Hemoglobin A1c in Liver Cirrhosis: A Case Report

Mathew Clarkea, Jamila Benmoussaa, Amulya Penmetsaa, b, Philip Otterbecka, Farhang Ebrahimia, Jay Nfonoyima

aDepartment of Internal Medicine, Richmond University Medical Center, Staten Island, NY, USA
bCorresponding Author: Amulya Penmetsa, Department of Internal Medicine, Richmond University Medical Center, 355 Bard Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10310, USA

Manuscript accepted for publication February 17, 2016
Short title: Hemoglobin A1c in Liver Cirrhosis
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jem326w


Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is the gold standard for the measurement of long-range glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM). In a rare subset of patients, this measurement may not be reliable. Inaccuracies of HbA1c in liver cirrhosis are rare, but documented. The objective of this study was to increase awareness about low HbA1c in liver cirrhosis and discuss alternative biomarkers that can be used to measure glycemic control. We present the case of a 61-year-old Caucasian female, with history of hepatitis C and uncontrolled T2DM, who was admitted for evaluation of compensated liver cirrhosis. She was found to have blood glucoses greater than 500 mg/dL; however, her HbA1c was measured at 5.5%. Ultrasound of the abdomen showed liver cirrhosis, ascites, and splenomegaly. Blood work revealed acute kidney injury, anemia of chronic disease, normal albumin level, and low HbA1c. Fructosamine and glycated albumin were high, indicating a hyperglycemic status during the last 3 weeks. HbA1c can be falsely low in liver cirrhosis, and can give a false assumption about control of the diabetic disease process. In this case, other biomarkers can be used to monitor glycemic control; by far frequent finger stick monitoring is the best method.

Keywords: Low HbA1c; Glucose monitoring; Liver cirrhosis; Fructosamine; Glycated albumin


For decades, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) has been the standard measure of long-range glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) even with comorbid liver cirrhosis. However, there are subsets of patients in whom there will be discordance between HbA1c and blood glucose measurements, rendering it less useful in determining a patient’s glycemic status. We present a case of woman with uncontrolled T2DM, acute kidney injury, and liver cirrhosis and discuss the challenges of assessing this patient’s glycemic control in view of the discordance between the patient’s HbA1c and blood glucose measurements.

Case Report▴Top 

A 61-year-old Caucasian woman, with history of hepatitis C, uncontrolled T2DM, and hypothyroidism presented with shortness of breath and increasing abdominal girth. Home medications included metformin, levothyroxine, and docusate. On physical examination, the patient had pallor, non-icteric sclerae, and poor dentition. Examination of the abdomen revealed a grossly distended abdomen with a positive fluid wave and a protruding, yet reducible umbilical hernia. Laboratory work on admission showed blood glucose of 568 mg/dL, white blood cell count of 5.5 × 109/L, hemoglobin of 11.5 mg/dL, hematocrit of 36.5%, MCV of 98.8 fL, platelets of 104,000/μL, prothrombin time of 12.1 s, partial thromboplastin time of 26.9 s, and international normalized ratio of 1.13. Chemistry panel showed sodium of 132 mmol/L, potassium of 5.6 mmol/l, creatinine of 1.6 mg/dL, blood urea nitrogen of 58 mg/dL, and a glomerular filtration rate of 32.7 mL/h. Liver function tests revealed total bilirubin of 0.7 mg/dL, alanine aminotransferase of 74 units/L, aspartate aminotransferase of 98 units/L, alkaline phosphatase of 621 IU/L, haptoglobin of 100 mg/dL, lactate dehydrogenase of 220 IU/L, total protein of 7.3 g/dL, and albumin of 3.2 g/dL. Iron studies showed iron level of 64 g/dL, iron-binding capacity of 212 g/dL, transferrin saturation of 30.1%, and ferritin level of 661.7 ng/mL. Metformin was stopped and an insulin regimen of basal glargine and pre-meal aspart was initiated. Despite medical management finger stick readings remained grossly uncontrolled (Table 1).

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Daily Finger Stick Log (mg/dL)

HbA1c was measured and found to be 5.5%. This finding was contrast to a previously measured HbA1c 1 year prior to admission that was 13.7% (Table 2).

Table 2.
Click to view
Table 2. Hemoglobin A1c

Possible etiologies that would explain this laboratory “mismatch”, like lab error, hemoglobinopathies or hemolytic anemia, were excluded. An abdominal ultrasound showed surface nodularity in the liver consistent with cirrhosis, ascites and splenomegaly.

HbA1c can be calculated by using average glucose (eAG) from seven consecutive finger stick readings within 2 days (calculation 28.7 × HbA1c - 46.7 = eAG) [1]. In our patient’s case, this value was found to be 12.08%. Given the discrepancy between finger stick blood glucose, calculated HbA1c and HbA1c measured in the laboratory, other markers were considered to monitor glycemic control, mainly fructosamine 415 µmol (normal: 200 - 285 µmol) and glycated albumin 4.7% (normal: 0.8-1.4%).

After dosing adjustments were made to the patient insulin regime, the patient’s blood glucose became controlled.


HbA1c has been widely accepted as the best long-range indicator of glycemic control in a diabetic patient. It is created when glucose binds to N-terminal valine of normal adult HbA. It is a representation of the fraction of hemoglobin proteins bound to glucose. The initial reference range of HbA1c was created based on a normal red blood cell lifespan. Changes in the availability of glucose, glycation rate, and red blood cell lifespan can alter HbA1c values [2]. False HbA1c values can be expected in patients with diseases that affect one or more of these factors. These include hemolytic anemia, hemoglobinopathies, renal failure, and liver cirrhosis [2-4]. Multiple factors contribute to shortened red blood cell survival and changes in HbA1c seen in liver cirrhosis like anemia of chronic disease, iron, folate or vitamin B12 deficiency anemia (frequent in case of alcoholism and malnutrition), low albumin, gastrointestinal bleed, or hypersplenism. Occasionally, autoimmune hepatitis can be associated with hemolytic anemia; however, hypersplenism causes sequestration of red blood cells and is the most frequent cause [3, 4]. In our patient, with T2DM and liver cirrhosis, splenomegaly, anemia of chronic disease, a low HbA1c did not indicate optimal glycemic control. In such situations, other parameters have emerged as having clinical significance in patients with diabetes and liver cirrhosis. Specifically, fructosamine and glycated albumin (GA) have been considered, as well as an overall measure known as chronic liver disease-HbA1c (CLD-HbA1c). CLD-HbA1c is defined by the formula- (HbA1c + GA/3)/2, where GA represents the portion of albumin that is glycated relative to the total albumin. It has been found to relate well to HbA1c calculated using average glucose [1] while simultaneously correcting for the confounding factor of cirrhosis (albumin and hemoglobin turnover). However, patients with renal disease were not accounted for in this study [5]. Since our patient was found to have acute kidney injury on admission, this measure alone would not be sufficient. Fructosamine is created when ketamines arise from blood glucose and bind to serum proteins, and glycated albumin is produced when serum albumin is combined with glucose. Both of these measures have been shown to be elevated in the setting of hyperglycemia, and it is thought to be representative of the glycemic status for the past 2 -3 weeks [4]. In our patient, fructosamine was found to be elevated at 415 µmol with a reference range of 210 - 421 µmol/L. Glycated albumin in our patient was 4.7% with a reference range of 0.8-1.4%. The fact that both of these levels are well above normal is indicative of a hyperglycemic state and poor diabetic control. Even though other markers have been explored for measuring glycemic control, there are several limitations to each measure. Since CLD-HbA1c has not been studied in patients with kidney failure, this comorbidity may limit the usage of CLD-HbA1c in this subgroup of patients. In addition, fructosamine and glycated albumin are both found to be affected in patients who have proteinuria or decreased albumin levels [4].


HbA1c by itself continues to be a valuable measure of glycemic control in T2DM and liver cirrhosis. However, in cases of patients with multiple comorbidities, its accuracy is diminished. In such patients health care providers must rely on other biomarkers. There is evidence to suggest that fructosamine and glycated albumin may be beneficial as part of normal monitoring in some cases of liver cirrhosis with discrepancy between HbA1c and blood glucose. However, these biomarkers can be inaccurate in patients with liver cirrhosis resulting in low albumin levels. Therefore, the best method for measuring glycemic status, in patients with T2DM and liver cirrhosis, is finger stick glucose monitoring.

  1. Nathan DM, Kuenen J, Borg R, Zheng H, Schoenfeld D, Heine RJ. Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(8):1473-1478.
    doi pubmed
  2. Hare MJ, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ. Current controversies in the use of haemoglobin A1c. J Intern Med. 2012;271(3):227-236.
    doi pubmed
  3. Bonora E, Tuomilehto J. The pros and cons of diagnosing diabetes with A1C. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(Suppl 2):S184-190.
    doi pubmed
  4. Blendea MC, Thompson MJ, Malkani S. Diabetes and Chronic Liver Disease: Etiology and Pitfalls in Monitoring. Clinical Diabetes. 2010;28(4):139-144.
  5. Koga M, Kasayama S, Kanehara H, Bando Y. CLD (chronic liver diseases)-HbA1C as a suitable indicator for estimation of mean plasma glucose in patients with chronic liver diseases. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;81(2):258-262.
    doi pubmed

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism is published by Elmer Press Inc.


Browse  Journals  


Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics


World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology


Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity


Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research


Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics



Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, bimonthly, ISSN 1923-2861 (print), 1923-287X (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)

This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jofem.org   editorial contact: editor@jofem.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.